The Supreme Court has released a 5-4 ruling that stops Michigan from suing to block a casino that is off-reservation. (Image: Wikimedia Commons)
The rules casinos that are governing by indigenous American tribal groups are varied and complex, relying on both federal laws and the compacts signed between states and the tribes that reside within them. This plays out in legal battles across the country, including one which was just settled in the court that is highest of this land.
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled this week that Michigan cannot sue a tribe to stop the opening and operation of a casino that is indian as tribal sovereign immunity overrules the state’s legal challenges. Your choice was a divisive one, as the justices had been split 5-4 in favor of the Bay Mills Indian Community.
Off-Reservation Casino in mind of Case
The situation revolved around a casino that the Bay Mills tribe integrated 2010 about 90 miles south of its booking, that is located on Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. The tribe had purchased land there with cash it received as part of a settlement aided by the federal government over allegations they gave up in 19th century treaties that they had not been properly compensated for land.
Since the casino was built on off-reservation land, Michigan had argued that its operation was in violation of the state compact and without permission from the state or governments that are federal.